Legal Opinion
Abberger v. Kulp
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
On the return day of a motion made by the plaintiffs herein for an order directing the defendants to show cause why such defendants should not be enjoined and restrained from passing a resolution removing the plaintiff, William A. Abberger, as a director of the defendant, Kulp Transportation Lines, Inn, during the pendency of this action, by consent there was submitted to the court a motion made by the defendants for the dismissal of the complaint herein. Both motions are disposed of in this memorandum.
The complaint contains two causes of action and its allegations in substance are that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Isaac v. MarcusNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Wangrow v. WangrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Bissell v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- In re KorffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tenney v. RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Auer v. DresselNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Grace v. Grace InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- In re SingerNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Kehaya v. AxtonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.