Legal Opinion

Wangrow v. Wangrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAvot, J.:

The relief which the complaint herein demands is that Herman and Samuel Wangrow, defendants, be required to account to the corporation for all sums of money which they have received or taken from it since October 31, 1917, and for all damages which the corporation has suffered by reason of the discontinuation of the business and by reason of the depreciation of any of its assets.

At the time of bringing the action, plaintiff was a member of the board of directors of the corporation and the holder of thirty-six shares of stock, and the individual defendants constituted a majority of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manix v. FantlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Hamilton v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tenney v. RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Mencher v. RichardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Alexander v. Quality Leather Goods Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Conant v. SchnallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API