Fitzgerald v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
This case raises the issue of whether a canine sniff of an apartment door is a search under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The United States Supreme Court and this Court have held that canine sniffs are non-searches for Fourth Amendment purposes. As the canine sniff doctrine does not depend upon the sniffs location, we shall hold that a sniff of an apartment door from a common area is a permissible non-search under the Fourth Amendment.
I
In February 2002, an anonymous source informed Detective Leeza Grim of the Howard County Police Department Criminal…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FeyenordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Greenstreet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Byndloss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Jardines v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.