Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 10, 2004No. 8, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

This case raises the issue of whether a canine sniff of an apartment door is a search under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The United States Supreme Court and this Court have held that canine sniffs are non-searches for Fourth Amendment purposes. As the canine sniff doctrine does not depend upon the sniffs location, we shall hold that a sniff of an apartment door from a common area is a permissible non-search under the Fourth Amendment.

I

In February 2002, an anonymous source informed Detective Leeza Grim of the Howard County Police Department Criminal…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FeyenordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Greenstreet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Byndloss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Jardines v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API