Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2005No. 04-52PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEBNER, District Judge, Retired.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Anthony J. Lindsay, entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere to possession of methamphetamine in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(c) (Lexis-Nexis 2003). On appeal, Lindsay asserts that evidence obtained from the search of his person upon his arrest, after a traffic stop, should have been suppressed. Finding that the search of Lindsay’s person was proper, we affirm.

FACTS 1

[¶ 2] On July 2, 2003, at 3:28 p.m., Trooper Mrnsy pulled over the vehicle that Lind say was driving because he witnessed that vehicle following another…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Garvin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kunselman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Flood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gompf v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API