Legal Opinion

Isom v. Rex Crude Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1905No. L.A. No. 1341PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W. F. Fitzgerald, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff, the owner of a certain piece of land in the city of Los Angeles, sued defendant as assignee of her lessee to have canceled and annulled a lease under which it was holding, and for damages for its unlawful extraction of oil from her land. She alleged that she was in an eastern state, and in ignorance of the condition of her property and of the surrounding property, and in ignorance of the fact that the land lay in an oil belt or district within the city of Los Angeles; that Book, her lessee, by letter represented to her that he wished to lease the premises for the purpose of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Wilson v. MoriartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Whyte v. RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Connecticut Life Insurance v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Keating v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Lynch v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. HaskellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Oklahoma · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API