Legal Opinion
Keating v. Preston
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1940No. Civ. 6403; Civ. 6404PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, Acting P. J.
The above-entitled suits were consolidated for trial. Both actions involve the validity and construction of a lease of a portion of hotel property in Sierra Madre for the purpose of conducting a restaurant business. The first ease is a suit to terminate the lease for alleged breach of an implied covenant not to violate section 337a of the Penal Code by accepting wagers from restaurant customers on horse races. The second suit sought to enjoin the lessor from demising or using space in the hotel for a competing restaurant business, and from closing the doorway communicating between the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Jones v. MariaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Belvedere Hotel Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Isom v. Rex Crude Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Parker v. the Lewis Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Ser-Bye Corp. v. C. P. & G. Markets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.