Enfield v. Hunt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
In this medical malpractice action plaintiffs Joseph and Claire Enfield appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Drs. Hunt. Hirabayashi, and Mannis which was granted on the theory that plaintiffs’ first amended complaint, depositions, and answers to interrogatories establish as a matter of law that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Defendants contend the action was filed more than “one year after the plaintiff discovered], or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury . . . .” (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5; Sanchez v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Wozniak v. Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Dujardin v. Ventura County Gen. Hosp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Association of Apartment Owners of Newtown Meadows Ex Rel. Board of Directors v. Venture 15, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.