Legal Opinion

Enfield v. Hunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1979No. Civ. 53966PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

In this medical malpractice action plaintiffs Joseph and Claire Enfield appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Drs. Hunt. Hirabayashi, and Mannis which was granted on the theory that plaintiffs’ first amended complaint, depositions, and answers to interrogatories establish as a matter of law that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Defendants contend the action was filed more than “one year after the plaintiff discovered], or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury . . . .” (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5; Sanchez v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Wozniak v. Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Dujardin v. Ventura County Gen. Hosp.California Court of Appeal · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Association of Apartment Owners of Newtown Meadows Ex Rel. Board of Directors v. Venture 15, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API