Pacifica Marine, Inc. v. Solomon Gold, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A bidder for mineral leases failed to turn in a required form that would have demonstrated that he was a citizen older than 18 and thus qualified to bid. The Director of the Department of Natural Resources' Division of Mining, Land & Water later allowed the bidder to remedy the omission, but on appeal the Department's Commissioner determined that the bidder's omission was not immaterial or due to excusable inadvertence and reversed the Director. As a result, the bidder lost his leases. The bidder unsue-cessfully appealed to the superior court and now…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough AssessorAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Levi v. State, Dept. of Labor and Workforce DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Alyeska International Inc. v. Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2026
- Alyeska International Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2026