Accountant's Computer Services, Inc. v. Kosydar
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
The essential issue common to each of these three eases is the applicability of the exception from taxation provided by R. C. 5739.01(B) for items of tangible personal property which are transferred, as an inconsequential element for which no separate charge is made, in conjunction with a transaction which also involves some significant degree of contracted-for service. Resolution of this issue necessitates an examination of the taxing scheme provided by statute in Ohio.
The Board of Tax Appeals, in its decisions, placed controlling weight upon the combined impact of two clauseg found in R, C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Koch v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Columbus Coated Fabrics Division v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Rice v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Recording Devices Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by42 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Metpath, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Statewide Multiple Listing Service, Inc. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Emery Industries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- White Motor Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.