Legal Opinion
Good v. Paine Furniture Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 5, 1978No. File 214120PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaeskey, J.
The plaintiff, Jerome M. Good, seeks monetary relief from the defendant for breach of a contractual obligation to compensate the plaintiff for the procurement of a lessee (Burger King Corporation) ready, willing and able to occupy realty owned by the defendant at 173 Asylum Street, Hartford. The plaintiff is a real estate broker licensed to perform services under the provisions of General Statutes §§ 20-311 et seq. He has been a realtor for twenty years and is thoroughly familiar with the requirements of General Statutes § 20-325a. By an ex parte order dated September 20, 1977, the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Herzog v. BlattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Burns v. GareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Peacock Realty Co. v. E. Thomas Crandall Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Jay Realty, Inc. v. Ahearn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Currie v. MaranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Real Estate Auctions, Inc. v. SenieConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.