Legal Opinion
Roger Vanderklok v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 22, 2017No. 16-3422PublishedCited by 338 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
Roger Vanderklok wanted to fly from Philadelphia to Miami, where he intended to run a half-marathon. In his carry-on luggage, he had a heart monitor and watch stored inside a piece of PVC pipe that was capped on both ends. During screening at the airport security checkpoint, the pipe and electronics prompted. . secondary screening, supervised by Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employee Charles Kieser. According to Vanderklok, Kieser was disrespectful and aggressive, so Vanderklok stated an intent to file a complaint against him.…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by338 opinions
- Charles Mack v. John YostCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Crystal Starnes v. Butler County Court of CommonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Plastic Surgery Center, P.A. v. Aetna Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Mynor Tun-Cos v. B. PerrotteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.