Legal Opinion

Corteal v. Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Doug Corteal, t/d/b/a Divito Park (Divito Park), petitions for review an order of the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (Department) adopting a proposed report of a Department of Transportation hearing officer revoking his advertising device permit because it violated the Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971(Act), Act of December 15, 1971, P.L. 596, as amended, 36 P.S. § 2718.101-2718.115, 1 and its applicable regulations, specifically, 67 Pa.Code § 445.4(b)(3)(iv), 2 prohibiting commercial advertising, and 67 Pa.Code § 445.6(e)(1), 3 prohibiting a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Mike's Sign Co. v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams Outdoor Adv., Lp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Smithfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Barge v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Circleville Road Partners LP v. ZHB of the Twp. of Ferguson v. Twp. of FergusonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Murrysville Watch Committee v. Municipality of Murrysville ZHB & Municipality of Murrysville v. Olympus Energy LLC v. D. & C. GesualeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API