Legal Opinion

Mike's Sign Co. v. Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1994No. 1625 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Mike’s Sign Company (Mike’s) appeals from an order of the Secretary of the Department of Transportation which affirmed revocation of Mike’s permit for an outdoor advertising device.

Pursuant to its regulations, 1 the Department of Transportation (DOT) revoked Mike’s permit for a sign located adjacent to Interstate 81 in Middlesex Township because the sign “suffered extensive storm related damage” in a windstorm on April 8, 1991. (R.R. at la.) DOT’s regulations provide that a nonconforming sign destroyed or damaged in a natural disaster, such as a storm, so that less than 50% of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seiwell v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Pine Haven Residential Care Home v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Media v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Highway News, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Corteal v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Com. v. Smarr, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Core Equity II, L.P. v. PennDOT, 700 Geerdes Blvd., King of Prussia, PA 19406Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API