Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Barge v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 2012PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Petitioners, who are current or former state correctional inmates1 accused or convicted of sex offenses, and who were granted parole, but were denied release to community corrections centers (CCCs), filed suit in our original jurisdiction. Petitioners challenge the policies and practices of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) and the Department of Corrections (DOC) in the parole release process. They seek mandamus and injunctive relief.2 DOC and the Board filed *534preliminary objections, challenging, among other things, the legal sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Patricia J. Mayes v. Stanley Rapoport Judith Rapoport David Key, D/B/A Key Coffee Roasters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Debro S. Abdul-Akbar v. Roderick R. MckelvieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coulter v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Health v. HanesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Barge v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Com. ex rel Grill v. AbramsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. ex rel Vanderpool v. AbramsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API