Legal Opinion

Driscoll v. California Street Cable Railroad

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1926No. Docket No. 5538PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by a collision with the cars of the defendant corporation. A trial was had in the trial court before the court sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $15,000 and the defendant has appealed, bringing up the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

For many years the defendant corporation has maintained and operated a cable street railroad on California Street in San Francisco. It has a double set of tracks. On the north side of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API