Legal Opinion
Fund for Animals v. Williams
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 25, 2003No. Civil Action 01-2078(RMU)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART The Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part The Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the parties’ thoroughly and cogently argued cross-motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs are the Fund for Animals, the Biodiversity Legal Foundation, the Utah Environmental Congress, the Humane Society of the United States, and two wildlife enthusiasts (collectively, “the plaintiffs”). They bring suit against the Fish and Wildlife…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fund for Animals v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Fund Animals v. Hogan, Matthew J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Fund for Animals v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- The Fund for Animals v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Montana Environmental Information Center v. U.S. Office of Surface MiningDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.