Legal Opinion
The Fund for Animals v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 23, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-2367(EGS)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs the Fund for Animals (“Fund”) and the Greater Yellowstone Coalition (“Yellowstone Coalition”) challenge the National Park Service’s (“Service” or “NPS”) administrative decision, codified in a 2003 Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (“SEIS”) and Record of Decision (“2003 ROD”), 1 to allow continued snowmobiling and trail grooming 2 in Yellowstone National Park, Grand Teton National Park, and the John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway (collectively “Yellowstone” or “Parks”). Plaintiffs allege that snowmobiling and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Wyoming v. United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Wyoming v. United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Wyoming Lodging & Restaurant Ass'n v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.