Legal Opinion
Fund for Animals v. Williams
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 3, 2004No. CIV.A.01-2078(RMU)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION to Alter or Amend the Court’s Judgment
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to alter or amend the court’s judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). The plaintiffs are the Fund for Animals, the Biodiversity Legal Foundation, the Utah Environmental Congress, the Humane Society of the United States, and two wildlife enthusiasts (collectively, “the plaintiffs”). They brought suit against the Fish and Wildlife Service (“the Service”) and the Department of the Interior…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fund Animals v. Hogan, Matthew J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Walsh v. HageeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ramirez v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- West v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Finca Santa Elena, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.