Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Kilborn

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1912No. L.A. No. 2889PublishedCited by 55 opinions

APPEAL from an. order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a motion for a new trial of a contest of a will after probate. Leon F. Moss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial of a contest of a will after probate. The appeal from the judgment revoking the probate of the will has heretofore been disposed of, such judgment having been affirmed in this court. (Estate of Kilborn, 158 Cal. 593, [112 Pac. 52].)

Some preliminary points urged by the respondent may be noticed before we proceed to a discussion of the merits. It is claimed that the portions of the transcript containing copies of the pleadings, the verdict of the jury, and the decree revoking probate are not to be considered because not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Jamison v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Llewellyn v. CheesewrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API