Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. City of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 12916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.—

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. It is admitted that defendant operates an electric street railway in San Francisco and that on the day in question plaintiff was a passenger for hire on one of the street-ears of defendant. It is also admitted that the streetcar in question stopped to discharge passengers, including plaintiff, at the intersection of Van Ness Avenue and Green Street. Plaintiff contends that while the plaintiff was in the act of alighting from the street-car and before she reached the street the street-car started up, causing plaintiff to fall to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kahn v. Triest-Rosenberg Cap Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Onell v. ChappellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Middleton v. Post Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API