Legal Opinion

Crooks v. White

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1930No. Civ. No. 7182Published

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

The plaintiffs W. L. Crooks and Fannie Crooks, husband and wife, brought this action against the defendant Henry White for damages for causing the death of their adult son, Walter Crooks.

The ease was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for defendant. From the judgment entered upon this verdict the plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.

On the night of June 18, 1928, defendant was driving his father’s automobile from Oakland to Benicia, and Walter Crooks, the deceased, was riding in said automobile as the guest of defendant. When they reached a point on the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API