State v. Gladden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BOBBITT, Chief Justice.
Defendant excepted to the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by Judge Collier at the conclusion of a voir dire hearing that was held to determine the admissibility of Cocker-ham’s testimony about statements made to him by defendant. Defendant assigns error on the ground the evidence did not support the court’s findings and conclusions.
On voir dire Cockerham testified that before he permitted defendant to tell what had occurred, he advised her in detail of each of her constitutional rights in the manner required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. HerbinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.