State v. Herbin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s denial of his motions for directed verdict at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. Defendant’s brief sets out no reason or argument and cites no authority in support of this assignment of error; therefore, it is deemed abandoned. Rule 28(a), (b)(3), Rules of Appellate Procedure; State v. Anderson, 281 N.C. 261, 188 S.E. 2d 336 (1972).
In any event, due to the seriousness of the charge and conviction in this case, we have examined the record carefully and find that there is ample evidence, when…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. ShaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.