State v. Pruitt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions to quash each bill of indictment on grounds that the North Carolina statutes imposing the death penalty for the crimes charged are unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. This Court considered and rejected this identical argument in State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625, 202 S.E. 2d 721. Accord: State v. Sparks, 285 N.C. 631, 207 S.E. 2d 712; State v. Honeycutt, 285 N.C. 174, 203 S.E. 2d 844; State v. Fowler, 285 N.C. 90, 203 S.E. 2d 803; State v.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Commonwealth v. MeehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.