State v. Spaulding
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
I
Defendant is charged with the murder of Hal Roscoe Simmons. At trial he admitted killing Simmons but offered evidence tending to show he did so out of fear because Simmons had threatened him and was advancing on him at the time of the killing. The trial court refused to instruct the jury on self-defense. We hold this was prejudicial error and order that defendant receive a new trial. We also discuss the admissibility of certain evidence offered by defendant relating to the issue of self-defense and defendant’s assignment of error concerning the exclusion of prospective jurors…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.