Legal Opinion

People v. Hanks

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 20, 1998No. 97SA215PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The deputy disciplinary counsel and the respondent in this lawyer discipline case executed a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in a range from one year and one day to three years. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that the respondent be suspended for two years. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. RudmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. PrebludSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. People v. SugarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API