Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Phoenix Hotel Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 29, 1914PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Payette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

The Phoenix Hotel Company, a corporation operating the Phoenix Hotel at Lexington, Ky., was indicted for exposing qnail for sale to its guests in the hotel within the period that the taking and killing of qnail is prohibited by law. The indictment was fonnd under section 1951 of the Kentucky Statutes, reading:

“Any person exposing for sale any of the animals or birds intended to he protected by this law within the periods for which the taking or killing thereof is hereby prohibited shall, for each animal or bird so exposed for sale, he subject to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Emery v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Overend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  4. Cullen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1873
  5. In re MarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. In Re NeffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. People v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. In Re BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Greenwood v. John R. Thompson Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API