Legal Opinion
In Re Neff
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 30, 1953No. 10947_1PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether a witness under subpoena during a criminal trial may be compelled over her objection based on the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination to answer certain questions which she had answered a year earlier before the grand jury which indicted the defendant on trial.
The defendant, Sylvia Neff, on October 21, 1952, in response to a subpoena issued by the Government, appeared as a witness in the District Court for the District of New Jersey at the trial of the case of United States v. Anthony Valenti, also known as…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Arndstein v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Temple v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Emspak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Emanuel JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- James H. Ellis, Jr. v. United States of America, Alfred M. Watkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Steven G. Slutzker in No. 03-4219 v. Philip Johnson Gerald J. Pappert Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., District Attorney, Allegheny County, Pa, in No. 03-4046Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.