Doe v. First United Methodist Church
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the causes of action asserted against Masten, First United and the school district were timely filed pursuant to the applicable statutes of limitations. Given the procedural posture of this case, we must accept the allegations in appellant’s complaint to be true at least with respect to the school district, since that defendant was granted a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. See Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 190, 192, 532 N.E.2d 753, 756, and Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contrs., Inc.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Love v. City of Port ClintonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Lutfi Saalim v. Walmart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Farris v. ComptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cundall v. U.S. BankOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Ault v. JaskoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.