Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Miller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1898No. 7994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of York county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This was an action by the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company upon a written contract executed by the defendants and one George Miller, whereby they promised to pay plaintiff on March 1, 1888, the sum of $802.95, with interest thereon at the rate of eight per cent per annum from December 27, 1884. The execution of the contract is admitted, and the answer sets up that the same was obtained by duress, and that the consideration was the compounding of a felony. These averments were *645put on the issue by the reply. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendants, and to reverse the judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snyder v. WilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Buck v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Baird v. BoehnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  4. Peed v. McKeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Friend v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Fairbanks-Morse Co. v. City of GearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Wilbur v. BlanchardIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ingebrigt v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Pruitt v. Oklahoma Steam Baking Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API