Baird v. Boehner
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mills District Court. — How. A. B. Thornell, Judge. Action by an unmarried woman to recover for ber own seduction, which, was accomplished by declarations of love, and by promises of marriage, and acts which implied a promise of marriage. There was a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The case has before been in this court. See 72 Iowa, 318.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The objections to the judgment will be considered .in the order of their discussion by def end-ant’s counsel. The evidence upon the last trial differed from the evidence on the first, as to the means used by defendant to accomplish plaintiff’s seduction. It was shown at the last trial that she was induced to submit *624to defendant’s desires by promises of marriage and professions of love made by him. The point upon which the case was decided upon the former appeal is not now in it.
1. Contract • ifillfagree“fibiiii/*" nouopei“seoute' II. A count of the answer pleads as a defense that the cause…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Casady v. Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Haines v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Cole v. Brown-Hurley Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Sisters of Mercy v. LightnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Rosenbaum Bros. v. LevittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.