Legal Opinion

Buck v. First National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1873PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Van Burén Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Suit was brought in the court below upon a promissory note given by the plaintiffs in error, in part payment, as it is claimed, of an indebtedness to the defendant in error,, of one R. M. Buck. The main facts which led to the giving: of the note are not in dispute. R. M. Buck had robbed the bank of a large sum, and had absconded. After a long search he was found, arrested and brought back to Paw Paw. The officers of the bank kept him in custody for a while before handing him over to the authorities, and during this time a large portion of his indebtedness to the bank was arranged by his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Sedgwick v. . StantonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Clippinger v. HepbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  4. Harris v. Roof's ExecutorsNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Hatzfield v. GuldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Spaulding v. MailletMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Adams v. East Boston Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API