Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. J. D. Millar Realty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1930No. Docket No. 4120PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The complaint alleges that on July 21, 1920, the defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff its promissory note for $22,490, setting out the note in full, the note reciting that it is “secured by a deed of trust of even date herewith”; that “the defendant has paid on account of said note, the sum of $10,371.70, including the net amount on foreclosure trust deed sale $1,725.40 as of the date of sale under foreclosure, to wit: December 2, 1925,” leaving due for principal and interest a balance of $12,073.13; that the said sale under foreclosure was held on December 2, 1925, “pursuant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winbigler v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lucy v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Menefee v. Raisch Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. United Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. English v. CulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ley v. BabcockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Scott v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Seidell v. Tuxedo Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API