Legal Opinion

Ley v. Babcock

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1931No. Docket No. 8066PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued to collect the deficiency on two promissory notes each in the principal sum of $2,500. Plaintiff had judgment and defendants appeal on a bill of exceptions.

On March 3, 1926, defendants purchased from plaintiff’s assignor a lot near Long Beach, California, for $10,000, paying $5,000 of the purchase money in cash and giving to the vendors the two promissory notes in suit which were secured by a deed of trust. The defendants failed to pay any portion of the balance due and the two promissory notes with the security therefor were duly assigned to the plaintiff, who caused the real…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of WempeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Standley v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Witter v. Bank of MilpitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Conte v. BusbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Hopkins v. J. D. Millar Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlin Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Lupertino v. CarbahalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Perez v. Golden Empire Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Lancaster Security Investment Corp. v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API