Legal Opinion

Seidell v. Tuxedo Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1934No. Civ. 5163PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HELD, J., pro tem.

This is a proceeding in equity to set aside a sale and deed executed pursuant thereto, purporting to have been made by trustees under power of sale conferred by a trust deed, being the same instrument involved in the case of Seidell v. Tuxedo Land Co., 216 Cal. 165 [13 Pac. (2d) 686], There the plaintiffs sought to enjoin the sale of the property secured by the trust deed, and relief was denied them. The sale now sought to be set aside herein was then had, and the purchaser thereat was the Stockton Abstract & Title Company. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case, the court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Mersfelder v. SpringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Jose Realty Co. v. PavlicevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Roberts v. ColyearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Seidell v. Tuxedo Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Seidell v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Harris v. SeidellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. McArthur v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Beck v. ReinholtzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API