Legal Opinion

Lucy v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1912No. L.A. No. 2883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This is an action for specific performance of a contract to convey certain real property. After plaintiff had introduced certain evidence and had rested his case, the defendant moved for a nonsuit. This motion being denied, defendant introduced no evidence. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals from said judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

By a certain agreement in writing one William H. Allen (described as the party of the first part), agreed to sell to one Paul Bittner (called the party of the second part) certain real property in Imperial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Latimer v. Capay Valley Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Diepenbrock v. LuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Kasishke v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Larson v. ThoresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Weinstein v. MoersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API