Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508 v. Lybrand

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2003No. 94676Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Garman

I concur with the majority’s finding that defendant is entitled to a setoff against the judgment in the amount of plaintiff’s settlement with Arthur Andersen. I write separately because I conclude that the audit interference doctrine is inconsistent with Illinois’ system of comparative fault. In addition, there is no reasonable basis on which to justify limiting the comparative negligence defense for accountants but not for other service providers. I would find admissible the defendant’s offered evidence of plaintiff’s negligent conduct that was a proximate cause of the alleged injury. Thus,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Maksimovic v. TsogalisIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API