Legal Opinion

Alvis v. Ribar

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1981No. 52875, 53788 consPublishedCited by 378 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

These two cases, consolidated for appeal, present a question which arises solely from the pleadings. In each, plaintiff’s complaint included a count based on the doctrine of comparative negligence, which count was dismissed by the trial court on motion by the defendants. In Alvis v. Ribar, the appellate court affirmed summarily, stating, “*** it is not for this court to attempt to reverse the many cases and opinions of the Illinois Supreme Court in this area.” (78 Ill. App. 3d 1117, 1119.) This court allowed leave to appeal. In Krohn v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., we granted a motion for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by378 opinions

  1. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gustafson v. BendaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Doyle v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

373 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API