Legal Opinion
Comeau v. Rupp
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 29, 1992No. Civ. A. 86-1531-MLBPublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BELOT, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of Defendants Grant Thornton (“Grant”) and Fox & Company (“Fox”) (collectively, “the Accountants”) for reconsideration; the Accountants’ motion in limine to exclude evidence on damages (Doc. 1012); and the Accountants’ motion in limine to exclude evidence of prejudgment interest. The facts of this case have already been discussed, 810 F.Supp. 1127 (D.Kan.1992), and will not be repeated.
I. Motion for Reconsideration
The standards governing motions to reconsider are well established. A motion to reconsider is…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- R. Richard Bastian, III v. Petren Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Emig v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Atchison Casting Corp. v. Dofasco, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Ulrich v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Waslow v. Grant Thornton LLP (In Re Jack Greenberg, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.