Legal Opinion
Hines v. Harmon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 6, 1936No. 25856PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, C. J.
This is a suit to recover damages for breach of warranty of title to real estate.
It is the third time the matters involved liereiu have come to this court. See Harmon v. Nofire, 131 Okla. 1, 267 P. 650; Harmon v. Hines, 160 Okla. 120, 16 P. (2d) 94.
In the original suit George Killer recovered judgment against T. F. Harmon for an undivided interest in certain real estate, the title to which R. W. Hines had warranted to him by the terms of a warranty deed, and which, in turn, had been warranted to Hines. Hines thereafter died, and plaintiffs in error, defendants below, as heirs of R. W. Hines,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Robinson & Co. v. BeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Adkins v. ArnoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Allen v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices & JudgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Ex parte HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Ex Parte BurnsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- R. V. McGinnis Theatres & Pay T. V., Inc. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.