Legal Opinion

State v. Guster

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1981No. 80-1129PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

The issue certified to this court is whether the defendant in a criminal trial is entitled, upon a proper request by counsel, to a jury instruction on eyewitness identification where that identification is the crucial issue in the case and is uncorroborated by other substantial evidence. The predicate for the argument of the appellant that such a cautionary instruction is indeed required is the fact that eyewitness identification is the product of sense perception and memory, both of which faculties, it is argued, are readily influenced, or misled, by a variety of unreliable external…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Scott v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. NelsonOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. United States v. Amos Annice ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cromer v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Akron (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2015

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API