Legal Opinion

State v. Broom

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988No. 87-1674PublishedCited by 319 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Romell Broom appeals his conviction and sentence of death. We uphold the conviction and the sentence of death for the reasons that follow.

This court is required to undertake a three-part analysis in all death penalty cases. State v. Clark (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 252, 527 N.E. 2d 844. First, we must consider all the issues raised by the appellant with respect to the proceedings. below. Second, we must independently weigh the aggravating circumstances against any mitigating *281factors to determine whether the death sentence is an appropriate sanction. Finally, we must independently determine…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by319 opinions

  1. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990

314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API