Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1986No. 85-227PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Per curiam

I

In his first proposition of law, appellant argues that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the state from placing the burden of proving self-defense on the accused. Based upon our recent decision in State v. Martin (1986), 21 Ohio St. 3d 91, we find no merit in this assertion.

In Martin, supra, this court examined and analyzed the holdings of the United States Supreme Court and our own past holdings on this issue. We concluded that where the state is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt every element of a crime as defined by statute, the defendant may fairly be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. RobbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. MelchiorOhio Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. State v. Wilson, 22581 (2-6-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. WillifordOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. WoullardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API