Commonwealth v. Yedinak
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from a March 9, 1995 judgment of sentence for driving under the influence of a controlled substance1 and possession of a small amount of marihuana.2 Appellant, James Yedinak, raises the following issues for our review:
I. [WHETHER] THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING [APPELLANT’S] MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE IN THAT NO PROBABLE CAUSE EXISTED TO JUSTIFY A SEARCH OF [APPELLANT’S] VEHICLE AND THE SEARCH CONDUCTED BY [THE] POLICE OFFICER WAS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF [APPELLANT’S] CONSENT?
II. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN ADMITTING AND…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. KohlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- United States v. Yong Hyon KimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. GauseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- State v. FriedelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Hess v. Warwick Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.