Legal Opinion

Hess v. Warwick Township Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 2009No. 843 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge LEADBETTER.

Gerard and Cynthia Hess (Appellants) appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County (common pleas) that affirmed the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Warwick Township (ZHB). The ZHB sustained the Hess’s appeal from an enforcement notice citing them for violation of the kennel regulations, denied their request for a use variance and denied the Hess’s request for a ruling that they may keep twenty-one Siberian Husky dogs on their property as an accessory use. In the present appeal, the Appellants challenge the last of these…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Ellis v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Berman v. Radnor Rolls, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. City of Hope v. Sadsbury Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Aldridge v. Jackson TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Hamilton Hills Group, LLC v. Hamilton Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Newtown Square East, L.P. v. Township of NewtownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Northampton Area School District v. Zoning Hearing Board of LehighCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API