Legal Opinion
Faus Group, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 25, 2009No. 2008-1605PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this classification ease is whether laminated flooring panels imported by Faus Group, Inc. (Faus) are properly classified as “fiberboard” under heading 4411 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (HTSUS), as the United States Customs Service (Customs) classified the goods, or as “builders’ joinery” under heading 4418, as Faus contends. The United States Court of International Trade sustained Customs’s classification. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the proper classification is under heading 4418, and more specifically under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Benq America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Del Monte Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Well Luck Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.