Legal Opinion

Lamb v. . Boyles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1926PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The plaintiff alleges that on 11 December, 1925, he bought from the Amazon Cotton Mill Cafe a bottle of strawberry ale which the defendant had manufactured and placed on the market; that the bottle contained some kind of noxious substance; that while drinking the ale he was taken sick and in consequence was confined to his bed for several days; tbat bis vision was impaired; tbat for many weeks be was unable to do bis usual work; tbat tbe defendant negligently prepared and sold an unwholesome drink, and tbat tbe defendant’s negligence was tbe direct cause of tbe plaintiff’s injury. In tbe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Dail v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Goldman & Freiman Bottling Co. v. SindellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Enloe v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Perry v. Kelford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API