Perry v. Kelford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.
The question of law is this: Upon the trial of an action for damages for personal injury caused by shivered glass in a bottle of coca-cola, is it competent upon the question of negligence to show that foreign substances were found in other bottles of beverage bottled and sold by the defendant “at about the same time” plaintiff was injured?
The rule of law governing the liability of the manufacturer of foods and beverages to a consumer, for injury occasioned by deleterious and harmful substance contained in such beverage, is clearly stated in Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 179 S. W., 155.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dail v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Dail v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Fitzgerald v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Windram Manufacturing Co. v. Boston Blacking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Enloe v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Corprew v. Geigy Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Corum v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Norfolk Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc. v. KrausseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Broadway v. . GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.