Legal Opinion

Unimark Photo, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 20, 1961No. C.D. 2283PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The shipments covered by these two protests consisted of certain 8-millimeter and 16-millimeter motion-picture cameras, which, at the time of importation, had certain attachments permanently installed therein or affixed thereto. A standard or prime lens with standard viewfinder is built into the body of the camera. Firmly attached thereto is a turret, to which are fitted wide-angle and telephoto viewfinder adaptors, with a wide-angle lens and a telephoto lens.

Except for the wide-angle lens and the telephoto lens, the imported merchandise was assessed with duty at the rate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charles Garcia & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Paillard, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Bushnell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Kanematsu New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Kanematsu New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Kanematsu New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API