Huckeby v. Spangler
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice.
Although these suits were instituted by separate complaints, they were disposed of in the trial court by a single order, and we have considered them together for purposes of this appeal. The complaints in the actions are similar, but because of one material difference in the two complaints, we will discuss them separately.
Appellant Huckeby instituted his action for damages against appellee Benton F. Spangler and twenty-two other named defendants on September 5, 1973. He attempted to sue all of the defendants individually and as members of an unnamed class of persons…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. GrimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Brumley v. Chattanooga Speedway & Motordrome Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Hyden's Administrator v. Stearns Coal & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Keel v. HainlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Day v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Merriman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Chenault v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Cecil v. HardinTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.